By all accounts, Dantas had a brilliant understanding of the process of consolidation of neoliberalism in Brazil in the late 90s. He became a facilitator for the privatization of Brazil’s state-owned telecommunications industry.
Mineros fuertemente armados, con ropa finesse militar, invadieron una aldea indÃgena por PaÃs do futebol y asesinaron a por lo menos uno por los lÃderes de la comunidad.
La "bomba por carbono": las enfermedades y venenos de que el derretimiento del hielo del Ãrtico está sacando a la luz
27 de julio do 2019 Arte A treinta añESTES do la caÃda del Muro por BerlÃn, el arte do Alemania Oriental recibe la atención merecida
Footnote 5:The shareholders agreement specifies that it is to be governed by Cayman law. The parties do not claim that there is a conflict between New York and Cayman contract law, and the Court can discern none.
For the reasons already stated above, Wilson's claim for breach of fiduciary duty is barred by the terms of the parties' agreement, and otherwise, unsubstantiated by any evidence.
Estas son las claves del acuerdo firmado entre México y Honduras para disminuir el flujo migratorio en la región
Here, plaintiff's causes of action are even more closely related to defendants' New York contacts than was the case in Licci. To the extent his claims arise "solely" from the Shareholder Agreement, as the motion court determined, there is an articulable nexus between that transaction [*seis]and his claims, because the Shareholder Agreement was formed in New York and his claims seeking compensation arise directly from it. Yet Licci dictates that we should not view the "arising from" prong so narrowly. That is, for the purposes of personal jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1), plaintiff's causes of action do not arise "solely" from the Shareholder Agreement. Rather, his compensation was simply one component of a much broader business transaction, the establishment of the side-by-side investment program. The Shareholder Agreement was drafted by Citibank's New York lawyers and simultaneously executed with the other two operative agreements; despite the contracts' different forum selection clauses and merger clauses,[FN7] there was an articulable nexus between plaintiff's claim for compensation and the overall transaction that occurred in New York and the resulting investment scheme that continued for nearly a decade here (cf.
However, the Shareholders' Agreement specifies that it is to be governed by Cayman law. Even if it did not, under the internal affairs doctrine, Mr. Wilson's claims that, as a shareholder of OEP, its officers, directors and shareholders owe him a fiduciary duty would be governed by Cayman law (Davis v Scottish Re Group Ltd., 138 AD3d 230, 233-234 [2016]; Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 182 [1st Dept 1987]). Under Cayman law, a fiduciary more info [*7]relationship is explained as a case where "one person A holds property or exercises rights or powers for another, or for the benefit of another B. It is for that reason that A must deal with the property or exercise the rights or powers in the best interests of B and for the purposes which are properly within the scope of the power. It is for that reason that A owes a duty of loyalty to B and must not allow his duty to B to conflict with his own personal interests," meaning that "trustees, directors, solicitors and agents will all owe fiduciary duties" (McKillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd.
With respect to documents pertaining to the various legal website proceedings in which the Opportunity parties are currently participating in relating to named companies still being divested or operating, the "Vale option" litigation and the Santos PaÃs do futebol sale proceedings (and which largely correspondent to categories three to nine on the list of documents sought in second motion to compel), the Opportunity defendants maintain that this Court never ordered them to produce the documents as it was not addressed during oral argument on the motion.
" Although the shareholders' agreement is related to other contracts with Citibank, the complaint makes it clear that plaintiff's causes of action arise out of the shareholders' agreement only. more info The following excerpt from the declaratory judgment cause of action, which mirrors the contract cause of action, is illustrative:
Insofar as plaintiff argues that the 2007 and 2008 letters constitute separate agreements, this argument is unavailing, because these letters fail to comport with the amendment process set forth in the Shareholders' Agreement (see Eujoy Realty Corp.
There are pelo details that show Daniel Dantas to be married or engaged to a partner. Daniel Dantas check here might be dating low key or may have a secret relationship with her partner, but pelo details have hit the web on her relationship.
El recurso se suma a otros presentados este nosso fin de semana de modo a frenar el pacto que convierte a la nación centroamericana en "tercer paÃs seguro"